The idea that the resolution of optical instruments is limited due to the
wave nature of light is familiar to students of optics and is embodied in the
Rayleigh's criterion which states that the angular resolution of a
telescope/microscope is ultimately diffraction limited and is given by
![]() |
(2.4.3) |
where is some measure of the aperture size. The need for higher angular
resolution has led to the development of instruments with larger size and
which operate at smaller wavelengths. In radioastronomy, the wavelengths are
so large that even though the sizes of radio telescopes are large, the angular
resolution is still poor compared to optical instruments. Thus while the
human eye has a diffraction limit of
and even modest optical
telescopes have diffraction limits2.4of
, even the largest radio telescopes (300m in diameter) have angular
resolutions of only
at 1 metre wavelength. To achieve higher
resolutions one has to either increase the diameter of the telescope further
(which is not practical) or decrease the observing wavelength. The second option
has led to a tendency for radio telescopes to operate at centimetre and
millimetre wavelengths, which leads to high angular resolutions. These
telescopes are however restricted to studying sources that are bright at
cm and mm wavelengths. To achieve high angular resolutions at metre wavelengths
one need telescopes with apertures that are hundreds of kilometers in size.
Single telescopes of this size are clearly impossible to build. Instead
radio astronomers achieve such angular resolutions using a technique called
aperture synthesis. Aperture synthesis is based on interferometry, the
principles of which are familiar to most physics students. There is in fact
a deep analogy between the double slit experiment with quasi-monochromatic
light and the radio two element interferometer. Instead of setting up this
analogy we choose the more common route to radio interferometry via the
van Cittert-Zernike theorem.