The ratio for the GMRT antennas was fixed at the value based both on structural design issues as well as preliminary studies of various feeds radiation patterns. Since the antennas are to work at meter wavelengths prime focus feeds were preferred. Cassegrain feeds at meter wavelengths would result in impractically large secondary mirrors (the mirror has to be several across) and concomitant large aperture blockage.
Six bands of frequencies had been identified [1] for the GMRT observations. It was deemed essential to be able to change the observing frequency rapidly, and consequently the feeds had to mounted on a rotating turret placed at the prime focus. If one were to mount all the six feeds on a rotating hexagon at the focus, the adjacent feeds will be separated by . If one wants to illuminate the entire aperture, then one has to have a feed pattern that extends at least up to the subtended angle of the parabola edge, which is (Note that , Figure 19.1). Hence this arrangement of feeds would cause the one feed to ``see'' the feeds on the adjacent faces. It was decided therefore to mount the feeds in orthogonal faces of a rotating cube. Since one needs six frequency bands, this leads to the constraint that at least two faces of the turret should support dual frequency capability. For astronomical reasons also dual frequency capability was highly desirable.
One specific aspect of GMRT design is the use of mesh panels to make the reflector surface[1]. Since the mesh is not perfectly reflective, transmission losses thorough the mesh have to be taken into account. Further, the expected surface errors of the mesh panels was mm. This implies that the maximum usable frequency is (see Section 19.2) MHz, independent of the transmission losses of the mesh. (Incidentally, since the meanspacing of feedsupport legs, m, the lowest usable frequency is around 6 MHz).
Several analytical methods exist in literature to compute the transmission loss through a mesh as a function of the cell size, the wire diameter and the wavelength of the incident radiation. The one chosen for our application is has good experimental support [2,3]. At the GMRT, the mesh size is mm for the central 1/3 of the dish, mm of the middle 1/3 of the dish and mm for the outer 1/3 of the dish. The wire diameter is mm. The transmission loss for at two fiducial wavelengths for these various mesh sizes is given in Table 19.2.

Each section of the dish not only has a separate mesh size but
also a separate surface rms error. If we call these rms surface errors
and the respective transmission
losses (at some given wavelength)
,
then the surface rms efficiency given by Eqn 19.4.15 has
to be altered to a weighted rms efficiency:
(19.5.17)  
(19.5.18)  
(19.5.19)  
The transmission loss gives a corresponding meshleakage or
meshtransmission efficiency,
, which is
given by
(19.5.21)  
(19.5.22)  
(19.5.23)  
Efficiencies computed for the different GMRT feeds (using their measured pattern, being the input) are given in Table 19.4.